PENDIDIKAN TINGGI KRISTEN DI INDONESIA: Sarjana Pantekosta Berebut Ruang di Indonesia CHRISTIAN HIGHER EDUCATION IN INDONESIA: Pentecostal graduates fighting for space in Indonesia Section Articles

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Elia Tambunan

Abstract

Pentecostal studies are too prevalent in terms revivalism, movements, and denominations globally. This paper is different because of the anthropological aspects of Pentecostalism outlines how intellectuals Pantecost defines itself in a variety of social situations in which they live. Through a combined quantitative and qualitative research, the authors found Pantecostal scholars find themselves in the time of torpor to redefine themselves and their strategic position in the social reality. Pantecostal scholars could be seen as a representation of the face of Christian higher education in Indonesia. The time of torpor in Pantecostal scholars start from the process of education in higher education who have feelings too in love with its own identity so that the bad impact on the general principles of a system of community-wide. This paper can be seen as a Pantecostal Church in Indonesia (GPdI) scholar contribution towards Pentecostal studies globally from the anthropologist perspective with the Pantecostal scholar use as the unit of analysis in the study of religion is still rarely used by the religious scholar in Indonesia.


===


Studi Pentakosta yang ada terlalu lazim dalam hal revivalisme, gerakan-gerakan, dan denominasi secara global. Tulisan ini berbeda karena menguraikan Pentakostalisme dari aspek antropologis bagaimana kaum intelektual Pantekosta mendefinisikan dirinya sendiri dalam berbagai situasi sosial di mana mereka hidup. Lewat penelitian gabungan kuantitatif dan kualitatif, penulis menemukan kelambanan sarjana Pantekosta untuk mendefinisikan ulang diri dan posisi strategis mereka dalam realitas sosial yang sangat luas. Sarjana Pantekosta bisa dilihat sebagai representasi wajah pendidikan tinggi Kristen di Indonesia. Kelambanan itu bermula dari proses pendidikan sarjana di lembaga pendidikan tinggi yang memiliki perasaan terlalu cinta kepada identitas sendiri sehingga berdampak buruk pada prinsip-prinsip umum dari satu sistem masyarakat luas. Tulisan ini bisa dilihat sebagai satu kontribusi Gereja Pantekosta di Indonesia terhadap studi Pentakosta secara global dari sisi antropologis dengan menggunakan sarjana Pantekosta sebagai unit analisis dalam studi agama yang masih jarang dipakai sarjana keagamaan di Indonesia.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Albrecht, Daniel E. Rites in the Spirit: A Ritual Approach to Pentecostal/Charismatic Spirituality. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1999.
  2. American Anthropological Association. “Teaching Pre-Collegiate Anthropology: The Results of a Survey and Recommendations.” Anthropology & Education Quarterly. Vol. 8, No. 3 (Aug. 1977): 193-195.
  3. Anis, Uwes. “Nomenklatur dan Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesia (KKNI) yang diberlakukan Kemenristek,” dalam Karolina A. Kaunang, Lenta Enni Simbolon (eds.). Prosiding: Konsultasi Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi Teologi di Indonesia “Pendidikan Tinggi Teologi dalam Arus Perubahan Pendidikan Tinggi Nasional. Jakarta: PERSETIA bekerjasama dengan Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Amanat Agung, 2017.
  4. Aritonang, Jan S. Berbagai Aliran di dalam dan di sekitar Gereja, cet.ke-2. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia, 1995. _______,
  5. Karel A. Steenbrink. A History of Christianity in Indonesia. Leiden: Brill, 2008.
  6. De Moor, Johannes Cornelis. Synchronic Or Diachronic?: A Debate on Method in Old Testament Exegesis. Leiden: E.J. Brill 2005.
  7. _______. “Sikap dan Strategi Lembaga-Lembaga Pendidikan Kristen Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0” (ceramah, Universitas Kristen Indonesia, Jakarta 7 November 2018).
  8. Bush, Kenneth D., Diana Saltarelli (eds.). The Two Faces of Education in Ethnic Conflict for Children. Florence, Italy: UNICEF, 2000.
  9. Cartledge, Mark J. Charismatic Glossolalia: An Empirical-Theological Study. London and New York: Routledge, 2002.
  10. Cobb, Paull, Experiential, “Cognitive, and Anthropological Perspectives in Mathematics Education.” For The Learning of Mathemathics. Vol. 9, No. 2 (June l989): 32-43.
  11. Comitas, Lambros, Janet L. Dolgin, “On Anthropology and Education: Retrospect and Prospect.” Anthropology and Education Quarterly. Vol. ix, No. 3 (1978): 165-180.
  12. Deininger, Matthias. Global Pentecostalism: An Inquiry into the Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Hamburg: Anchor Academic Publishing, 2014.