How Neutrosophic Logic may Resolve Dispute on the Origin of the Universe through re-reading Gen. 1:1-2


Victor Christianto
Florentin Smarandache


In recent years, the Big Bang as described by the Lambda CDM-Standard Model Cosmology has become widely accepted by majority of physics and cosmology communities. But the philosophical problems remain, as Vaas pointed out: Did the universe have a beginning or does it exist forever, i.e. is it eternal at least in relation to the past? This fundamental question was a main topic in ancient philosophy of nature and the Middle Ages, and still has its revival in modern physical cosmology both in the controversy between the big bang and steady state models some decades ago and in the contemporary attempts to explain the big bang within a quantum cosmological (vacuum fluctuation) framework. In this paper we argue that Neutrosophic Logic offers a resolution to the long standing disputes between beginning and eternity of the Universe. In other words, in this respect we agree with Vaas, i.e. it can be shown: “how a conceptual and perhaps physical solution of the temporal aspect of Immanuel Kant’s „first antinomy of pure reason“ is possible, i.e. how our universe in some respect could have both a beginning and an eternal existence. Therefore, paradoxically, there might have been a time before time or a beginning of time in time.” By the help of computational simulation, we also show how a model of early Universe with rotation can fit this new picture. Further observations are recommended.



  2. Michael J. Longo. 2007. Evidence for a Preferred Handedness of Spiral Galaxies. arXiv: astroph/0707.3793; [2a] M.J. Longo. Does the Universe Have a Handedness? arXiv: 0812.3437; [2b] M.J. Longo. Physics Letters B 10.1016.
  3. Rudiger Vaas. 2004. Time before Time: Classifications of universes in contemporary cosmology, and how to avoid the antinomy of the beginning and eternity of the world. arXiv: 0408111.
  4. Paul Copan. 1996. Is creation ex-nihilo a post-biblical invention? An examination of Gerhard May’s proposal. TRINJ 17NS
  5. Helge Kragh. 2017. Cosmology and the Origin of the Universe: Historical and Conceptual Perspectives. arXiv: 1706.00726
  6. Amos Yong. 2011. The Spirit of Creation. Cambridge: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publ. Co.
  7. Gerhard F. Hasel. The polemic nature of the Genesis Cosmology. The Evangelical Quarterly.
  8. Ildus S. Nurgaliev. 2012. E pur si muove! arXiv: 1210.4091.
  9. a] see also Singularities are averted by vortices. 13th Gravitational Conference – International Conference on Gravitation, Cosmology and Astrophysics. June 23-28, 2008. Peoples Friendship University of Russia (PFUR), Moscow, Russia. Abstracts. Published by PFUR, ISBN 978-5-209-03274-8, pp. 117–118;
  10. b] Also in Gravitation and Cosmology vol. 16 no. 4 (2010) pp. 313-315.
  11. Victor Christianto & Florentin Smarandache & Yunita Umniyati. 2017. Solving Numerically Ermakov-type Equation for Newtonian Cosmology Model with Vortex. Prespacetime Journal, Oct. 2017.
  12. V. Christianto. 2014. An Outline of Cosmology Based on Interpretation of the Johannine Prologue, The Bulletin of Society for Mathematical Services and Standards, Vol. 11, pp. 4-12, 2014. url:
  13. V. Christianto. 2015. Four Possible Applications of a Navier-Stokes Cosmology. Prespacetime Journal Vol. 6 No. 11, url:
  14. V. Christianto. 2015. A Possible Route to Navier-Stokes Cosmology on Cantor Sets. Prespacetime Journal Vol. 6 No. 8. url:
  15. V. Christianto. 2017. A Theo-Cymatic Reading of Prolegomena of St. John's Gospel. Scientific GOD Journal, Vol. 8 no. 4, url:
  16. Georgios Vatistas. 2012. The presence of interstellar turbulence could explain the velocity flattening in galaxies. arXiv: 1012.1384
  17. Wilf Hildebrandt. 1995. An Old Testament Theology of the Spirit of God. Peabody: Hendrickson Publisher, Inc.